We got a letter from one of our fellow members, signed simply “P.H.,” and it was too good not to share. It’s thoughtful, a little fiery, and full of heart. More than anything, it’s a real conversation starter about how this elections are being handled. So whether you’re having your morning coffee or winding down with a glass of wine, take a minute to read P.H.’s take. It’s a smart, honest look at why your vote, or your choice not to vote, really matters.
A Tale of Two Memberships and the Importance of Choice
Dear Santaluz family,
Let’s start with a round of applause for our Golf Membership. Seriously, give yourselves a pat on the back. This year, you’ve got three candidates vying for just two open seats. That’s not just a choice; it’s a healthy competition that shows members want their voices heard. Whether you support Derek Andersen or prefer Brad Barnum or Craig Benedetto, it’s encouraging to see multiple people stepping up. It feels democratic, and that’s something to celebrate.
What About the Hacienda Membership?
Now, let’s talk about the Hacienda Membership. Despite the steady stream of emails urging members to vote, this election is already tied up. There are two candidates, Chris Johnston and Amy Dorman, for two available seats. That’s it. No alternatives. No competition.
This isn’t a critique of the candidates themselves. Chris and Amy may be wonderful, thoughtful individuals. But the issue isn’t who is running. It’s the lack of choice. Isn’t the whole point of an election to give members options?
What’s the Purpose of This Vote?
If the outcome is already predetermined, what’s the purpose of the vote? Is it just to make the process look legitimate? Because that’s how it feels to many Hacienda members. Voting without options isn’t a real vote. It’s just going through the motions.
Removing choice undermines trust. It doesn’t inspire participation. In fact, it discourages it. It tells members their vote doesn’t count and that decisions are being made behind closed doors.
A Peaceful, Clear Response: Sit This One Out
Here’s a respectful suggestion for fellow Hacienda members. Consider not voting. According to the election rules, if fewer than 40 percent of members participate, the vote can’t be certified. That would trigger a new election, one that could finally include more than just two predetermined names.
So far, only 28.2 percent of eligible Hacienda members have voted. That’s not apathy. That’s a message. Nearly 72 percent are already signaling they’re not comfortable with how this election is being handled.
This Isn’t Personal. It’s About the Process
To be absolutely clear, this isn’t about Chris or Amy. They deserve respect and appreciation. But the principle matters. Hundreds of families are affected by Board decisions. They deserve to be part of a process that invites participation, not simply compliance.
Listening to criticism, even when it’s uncomfortable, is a sign of leadership. It strengthens the community. Legal threats and defensive reactions do the opposite.
The SMA Sets the Standard
If you want to see how things can be done better, look no further than the Santaluz SMA. Their elections reflect real governance with real competition and transparency. It’s a structure that respects members and invites input. The SMA is not perfect, but it provides an example of how elections should be handled—open, fair, and with actual choices. It’s time the Club Board took a page from their book.
Let’s Do Better Together
We all care about Santaluz. We love the beauty, the people, and the traditions that make this place home. But for it to truly be a community, we need a process that offers more than a voice. It must offer a choice.
So, Hacienda members, consider the message your vote, or your non-vote, can send. Let’s aim for a future where all members feel heard, respected, and included.
With hope and a touch of sass,
P.H.
